Looking at Buying a Bank Owned (REO) Property? Here’s a Few Things You Should Know.

Bank-Owned (“REO”) properties refer to real estat that has been acquired by the lender as a result of foreclosre. (that is, the term REO refers to Real Estate Owned by a “Bank” .)

REOs can provide opportunities to  buy a home at a bargain price since the lien holders want to recover as much as they can of their investment quickly.  (The holding and marketing of real estate is not their principal business.) 

The properties that do revert to the lien holders after foreclosure are offered for sale, and many do show up as “REO” or “Bank Owned” listings on the local Multiple Listing Service (even though they may not really be owned by a bank, as explained below.)

 As you probably know, most banks sell off their mortgage loans to raise additional money for new loans.  The mortgage loans are sold to “Fannie Mae” or “Freddie Mac” (two entities that are now wholly owned government agencies), or to private investors.  After having sold off the mortgage, the bank  may continue to be involved as a “loan servicer” (managing the collection of payments, escrow of tax and insurance payments, etc.) for the purchaser of the mortgage. 

 While, as noted, these properties can represent an attractive purchase opportunity, there are a number of traps in the purchase of an REO property, and this post is an attempt to highlight some of the issues you need to be wary of.

 (Note that the following discussion is specifically related to real estate transactions in California.  However, the general issue discussed is likely to be relevant elsewhere.)

 The process for submitting an offer on an MLS listed REO is similar to submitting an offer on a non lender-owned property.  That is, both types of transactions are initiated by the potential buyer submitting a purchase offer to a agent.  (If a real estate agent is representing the buyer, then the offer typically involves the use of a standard purchase agreement developed and approved by the California Association of Realtors.)

 While Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have stated that they would adopt the local contracts in use in various jurisdictions to facilitate REO sales, that is not quite what happens.

 Unlike traditional sales, where there is a formal give and take regarding the terms of the proposed transaction through the use of written Counter Offers, that is not typically done for REOs. 

Instead, the communication o fcontract changes from the seller can be largely verbal, including up to the point of a “verbal acceptance” of the offer.

(Note that a verbal acceptance of an offer does not really have meaning since contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate must be in writing and signed by the parties.)

After providing the “verbal acceptance”, the service providers (as instructed by the lenders) note that all the buyer needs to do is to sign a simple “addendum” and the lender will then sign both the purchase agreement and the addendum also.

What they frequently fail to mention is that the addendum is really a counter offer that changes the terms of the purchase agreement, and may contain convoluted and ambiguous terms.

If that issue is raised by the buyer or the buyer’s agent, the response is that the addendum is largely non-negotiable.

One example of the problem this can create is in the area of the contingency removal for completion of inspections and other investigations. 

Under the default provisions of the C.A.R. purchase agreement, a buyer has to affirmatively remove these contingencies before the buyer’s earnest money deposit is at risk if the buyer later withdraws from the transaction.

Under the REO addendum, the contingency removal is changed to what is referred to as “passive” removal.  That is, unless the buyer submits a written disapproval notice, the contingencies are deemed removed as f the contingency removal date.

Also, some of the addendums “nest” the contingency removal period – that is, the addendum may allow for 10 days for contingency removal, but only 5 days for any issues disclosed from an inspection of the home by a home inspector.  (So one has to keep both time periods in mind, along with the rules regarding when the 5 or 10 day period ends.)

Also, the addendum may note that this contingency period will start on the date of “verbal approval”, rather than the date that the contract actually became a binding document by being signed by the “bank”.

In one transaction, written acceptance did not occur for 4 or 5 days from the date of  verbal acceptance, and the listing agent would not allow the property to be inspected until the signatures were finalized.

Further, at that time, the “bank” required that the buyer utilize an out of area title and escrow company that they had specified, and that company was slow in providing the necessary documents for review.

To avoid putting the buyer’s earnest money deposit at risk before information regarding easments, covenants, etc. could be reviewed (and to allow for enough time to physically inspect the property), it became necessary to submit repeated “notices of disapproval”  requesting that the contingency period.

So be wary of the documents that you may be asked to sign if purchasing an REO, and keep in mind you need to stay on top of the time periods specified in the transaction.

There were other issues in the transaction (some of which also arose from the addendum), and I’ll address those in another post.

What I found particularly disturbing in the above is that the “bank” was one of the government agencies noted above. (an entity that is owned by all of us as taxpayers; and an entity  that we are also bailing out to the tune of billions of dollars.)

That such an entity appears to be trying to trick or trap consumers is, in my opinion, outrageous.  

President Obama, lets correct this situation now!

What do you think?

This is not intended as legal, technical, or tax advice. Please speak with a licensed professional before making any decision. Information is deemed reliable as of the date of writing, but is not guaranteed. The views expressed here are Arthur Chatroo’s personal views and do not reflect the views of Realty Experts.  This information is provided as a courtesy to our viewers to help them make informed decisions.

The Trouble With Short Sales

Short Sales, like REO (“Bank” Owned and Trustee (foreclosure) Auctions, may also provide opportunities to purchase a home or investment property at a below market price. However, they are not for everyone.

 If you need to purchase a property within a specific time frame (due to, e.g., a job relocation, 1031 Exchange, to meet eligibility requirements prior to the start of a new school year, etc.), then a short sale is probably not the right choice for you. While a few short sales have been able to close within two to three months, most have taken considerably longer than that (and six to nine months or longer has been more typical. (There are some government programs and new guidelines introduced in an effort to improve this situation, but those programs and guidelines are voluntary and it remains to be seen whether they will improve upon this situation.)

One of the reasons for this is that, for a short sale to go forward, all of the lenders (and possibly other lienholders as well), must agree to accept less than what they are owed, and they may not be willing to do that for a number of reasons, including:

   • The Seller not qualifying for a short sale under the lender’s policies (including, for example, having too much in assets or income and/or lack of a financial hardship);

   • The failure of the Seller (and/or the Listing Agent) to submit a complete file when requesting the short sale (This is something that your agent will likely have little or  no control over);

  • The practices of the loan servicing companies (who typically handle the short sale negotiations), especially since they generally do not have a great incentive to move the transaction along. ( In fact, they may actually have an incentive to slow things down given the way their compensation is reportedly structured – that is,:

      o It’s not their loan, so they are not the ones who are going to suffer any additional loss if the home is foreclosed upon; o The loan servicing fee that they earn is typically higher for a loan that is in default than for a loan that is current.;

      o Their negotiators are typically overworked (with many handling hundreds of transactions at a time), undercompensated, and frequently not very knowledgeable about the mechanics of a real estate transaction.:

      o The apparent lack of communication between their Loss Mitigation and the Asset Management (foreclosure) Departments. As a result, properties approved for a short sale by the Loss Mitgation Department may still be foreclosed upon by the Asset Management Department.

For those unfamiliar with the process (and for of us who are), the loan processors frequently appear to be irrational, clueless and vindictive.

Other factors to consider are:

    • The property is more likely to be in need of repairs; • It is likely that there will not be any provision for repairs to the property or remediation of any conditions (e.g., termite infestation) if those items are identified during the inspection process.:

    • The Buyer may also be required to pay for most of the Closing Costs incurred in the transaction (including all of the escrow, document and transfer fees, as well as the full cost of Owner’s Title Policy, which in San Diego is typically paid for by the Seller); • Its not a level playing field in terms of information, negotiating power and transparency. (That is, the loan servicers demand full disclosure from the Seller and the Buyer, but will not provide the same in return. As a result, the Buyer and the Seller may not know who now owns the note, what the note holders policies actually are, and the value (and basis) that was indicted from the appraisal or Broker Price Opinion that they ordered.)

Since each Short Sale transaction is unique, it is important to analyze the situation to determine whether it is worthwhile to go forward and spend the time and money that will be involved in trying to get any particular  transaction to close.

This is not intended as legal, technical, or tax advice. Please speak with a licensed professional before making any decision. Information is deemed reliable as of the date of writing, but is not guaranteed. The views expressed here are Arthur Chatroo’s personal views and do not reflect the views of Realty Experts.  This information is provided as a courtesy to our viewers to help them make informed decisions.